Dear Suzanne

 

Yesterday I called you out by way of a tweet. Unlike many ‘blue tick’ people, you had the courtesy to respond, and I am very grateful for that. You replied that your definition of feminism and mine are different. But are they? I would argue that we have much more in common than divides us. 

Now I know I am a trans woman and am outnumbered by women ninety-nine to one. I know I am different and was unable to be a girl or give birth – to this day, these facts make me very sad. But my biological issues do not stop me from being a feminist, and in this, we must surely share these concerns: 

Now we get to those contentious bits about feminism and trans inclusion – but is it really that difficult?

Most women in society are quite happy to accept trans women. I know, I work with them. Those that dont often seem to be abuse survivors. But that should not cloud their judgement as trans women are very often abused themselves. 

You worry about the sports issues but is that not for the relating sports bodies to deal with?  You may not be aware either that there is a research report from Loughborough University that concludes that trans people in sport are disadvantaged not advantaged. To see the report please click HERE. In the UK, the Equality Act makes it entirely legal to discriminate when appropriate. Fairness and protection from injury are valid but did you know that a few months ago, Stella Moore, a trans woman, was banned from playing in a woman’s team? The sport? Bowls! 

And what about those single-sex spaces that many trans people (myself included) really do not have an issue with. For we are not above the law and again if the service provider decides to exclude anyone, they can. But if they do that, unfairly (the legal term is ‘proportionate means to a legitimate aim’) – the law is there to assist. 

So I would argue there is much more that unites us than divides us and I have not even mentioned the biggest enemy of us all – patriarchy. And I would further argue that the gender war is false. Based on exaggeration, fear and lies. 

For trans women are still going to use the ladies – always going to exist – will still be part of society. We are part of diversity, not to threaten, abuse, or be rude but to contribute as best as possible. 

Neither the gender-critical nor trans folk will win this false war – but in the meantime, feminism fails, and patriarchy moves forward – silently.

 

Best Wishes,

Steph 

Share.

Steph Richards (she/her) is a 74-year-old human rights activist, intersectional feminist, and recipient of a 2023 Inspirational Women of Portsmouth Award. Holding a Gender Recognition Certificate and "post op", she is the founder and Chair of Translucent.Org.UK, which was named LGBT Organisation of the Year at the 2022 National Diversity Awards. Steph was also shortlisted as a Positive Role Model for Gender at the 2025 National Diversity Awards. Steph’s leadership spans political, healthcare, and community advocacy. She served as the Women’s and LGBT Officer for the Portsmouth Labour Party (2021–2024), co-founded the Women’s Action Network (Portsmouth), and is a former CEO of a women’s health charity. A passionate champion for women's healthcare, she possesses extensive expertise in baby loss awareness, actively defends UK abortion rights and is a member of "Women Against the Far-Right". Calling out VAWG, Steph has researched and written about 125 women and girls killed by a man. A prominent voice in national media and debate, Steph has been featured live on BBC Radio 4's Woman's Hour, Anti Social, Good Morning Britain, Times Radio, LBC, GB News, and Channel 4 News. In 2023, she debated trans human rights alongside Harvard biologist Dr. Carole Hooven at a prominent US university event.

Exit mobile version
Skip to content