Dear Suzanne

 

Yesterday I called you out by way of a tweet. Unlike many ‘blue tick’ people, you had the courtesy to respond, and I am very grateful for that. You replied that your definition of feminism and mine are different. But are they? I would argue that we have much more in common than divides us. 

Now I know I am a trans woman and am outnumbered by women ninety-nine to one. I know I am different and was unable to be a girl or give birth – to this day, these facts make me very sad. But my biological issues do not stop me from being a feminist, and in this, we must surely share these concerns: 

Now we get to those contentious bits about feminism and trans inclusion – but is it really that difficult?

Most women in society are quite happy to accept trans women. I know, I work with them. Those that dont often seem to be abuse survivors. But that should not cloud their judgement as trans women are very often abused themselves. 

You worry about the sports issues but is that not for the relating sports bodies to deal with?  You may not be aware either that there is a research report from Loughborough University that concludes that trans people in sport are disadvantaged not advantaged. To see the report please click HERE. In the UK, the Equality Act makes it entirely legal to discriminate when appropriate. Fairness and protection from injury are valid but did you know that a few months ago, Stella Moore, a trans woman, was banned from playing in a woman’s team? The sport? Bowls! 

And what about those single-sex spaces that many trans people (myself included) really do not have an issue with. For we are not above the law and again if the service provider decides to exclude anyone, they can. But if they do that, unfairly (the legal term is ‘proportionate means to a legitimate aim’) – the law is there to assist. 

So I would argue there is much more that unites us than divides us and I have not even mentioned the biggest enemy of us all – patriarchy. And I would further argue that the gender war is false. Based on exaggeration, fear and lies. 

For trans women are still going to use the ladies – always going to exist – will still be part of society. We are part of diversity, not to threaten, abuse, or be rude but to contribute as best as possible. 

Neither the gender-critical nor trans folk will win this false war – but in the meantime, feminism fails, and patriarchy moves forward – silently.

 

Best Wishes,

Steph 

Share.

(Pronouns - she/her) - Steph Richards is a 73-year-old 'post-op' trans woman with a Gender Recognition Certificate and works as a human rights activist. She was the elected Women's and LGBT Officer at Portsmouth Labour Party 2021 - 2024, CEO of Translucent.Org.UK, winner of the LGBT Organisation of the Year at the National Diversity Awards in 2022, co-founder of Women's Action Network (Portsmouth) and a volunteer at a Women's health charity. Steph was shortlisted as a "Gender Role Model" at the National Diversity Awards in 2025. Steph has been platformed live on BBC Radio 4 three times, including Women's Hour. She has also appeared on Times Radio, LBC Radio, GB News and Channel 4 News. In 2023, Steph debated trans human rights at an American university event alongside Harvard biologist and author Carole Hooven, PhD. Steph (an intersectional feminist) is passionate about the inclusion and acceptance of trans people in society. She advocates for women in prison, specifically pregnant women and calls out the mounting concern that abortion rights are at risk in the UK. She was the recipient of an Inspirational Women of Portsmouth Award in March, 2023.

Exit mobile version
Skip to content