Twitter is renowned as a chamber of hate, and for sure, some people can only take the self-imposed stress for short periods. Many good folks, with the best of intentions, are driven from it altogether – more recently Munroe Bergdorf.  

Compared to most, I probably deal with hate better than most – but one issue is sure to rile me more than any other. That is being indirectly accused of being a predator, sex offender or abuser of women. I usually dont “bite” but within 48 hours two of my gender-critical followers, (I would argue much more reasonable and decent than most) posted images of trans sex offenders, and quite understandably I am upset by it. 

I know lots of trans folks want to retaliate by posting images of Myria Hindley et al – because for sure there are lots of cis-gender sex offenders as well, both male and female.

The last stats I looked at stated there were 13,359 sex offenders in England and Wales and just 60 were trans. In percentage terms that is only 0.45% – and as trans folk are believed to be about 1% of the population, we offend less than cis-gendered people.

However, stats (which happen to be a strong point of mine) can always be “manipulated to work an advantage” – there is invariably an opening somewhere to provide a counter-argument. Indeed Fair Play for Women did precisely that – using the fact that overall trans offending is incredibly low, they could argue (mathematically correctly) that trans women convicted of sex offences – in terms of percentage against other crimes, was high. 

When used in this way, as a percentage, women are quite naturally horrified. Fair Play for Women (who should be renamed Unfair) decided to “forget” the 13,299 cis-gendered sex offending prisoners, some of whom are the worst abusers, rapists and murderers on the planet. The actual stats that I have are these, regarding trans women :

How could “we” change the sex offender percentage? 

Crazily either offending more in relation to committing non-sexual offences or much more preferably – not committing any sex offences at all. 

Notice the “we” is in speech marks though, I like all other decent citizens abhor crime of any sort, and trans folk who commit crime do not do it in my name. Indeed, I disown every one, though I do accept many have mental health issues and should accordingly be treated and given as much help as possible. 

And here is the crux of why I get stressed on Twitter – seeing a constant stream of images of “sex offending trans women” I have no relation to at all.  

I am being “smeared.”  

The gender-critical do not have to post these images.

It serves no purpose other than to alienate law-abiding trans folk. And more to the point – WE DONT DO IT TO THEM.  

Share.

Steph Richards (she/her) is a 74-year-old human rights activist, intersectional feminist, and recipient of a 2023 Inspirational Women of Portsmouth Award. Holding a Gender Recognition Certificate and "post op", she is the founder and Chair of Translucent.Org.UK, which was named LGBT Organisation of the Year at the 2022 National Diversity Awards. Steph was also shortlisted as a Positive Role Model for Gender at the 2025 National Diversity Awards. Steph’s leadership spans political, healthcare, and community advocacy. She served as the Women’s and LGBT Officer for the Portsmouth Labour Party (2021–2024), co-founded the Women’s Action Network (Portsmouth), and is a former CEO of a women’s health charity. A passionate champion for women's healthcare, she possesses extensive expertise in baby loss awareness, actively defends UK abortion rights and is a member of "Women Against the Far-Right". Calling out VAWG, Steph has researched and written about 125 women and girls killed by a man. A prominent voice in national media and debate, Steph has been featured live on BBC Radio 4's Woman's Hour, Anti Social, Good Morning Britain, Times Radio, LBC, GB News, and Channel 4 News. In 2023, she debated trans human rights alongside Harvard biologist Dr. Carole Hooven at a prominent US university event.

Exit mobile version
Skip to content